Real Estate: Three Common Mistakes Healthcare Professionals Make

by Matt Kolcum, Carr Healthcare Realty

Real estate is the second highest expense behind payroll for most healthcare practices. The benefits of capitalizing during lease negotiations can include a healthy raise through increased profitability, reduced debt, a nicer office and more. On the contrary, if negotiations are not handled properly, the results can be decreased profitability; resulting in the need to produce tens to hundreds of thousands of additional dollars just to pay the same bills that should have cost dramatically less.

While there are many key concepts and strategies you should always do prior to and during any lease or purchase negotiation, there are an equal or greater number of mistakes you should avoid. Having represented thousands of healthcare professionals over the last decade, we have gathered some of the most common mistakes healthcare professionals make during lease and purchase negotiations with the goal of helping others avoid the same mistakes. Here are three of the most common mistakes:

#1: Believing the landlord or seller will simply offer their best terms

Landlords and sellers are in business to make money. They are no more likely to voluntarily reduce lease rates or give up any extra money through concessions as you would be to voluntarily reduce your reimbursement from an insurance company or cut your patient fees if you didn’t have to. While it sounds pleasant to hear a landlord talk about giving a ‘fair deal’ or ‘reasonable price’, your odds of getting either are bleak without truly understanding the market, entering the negotiation process with multiple other options and having the needed guidance to capitalize. Trusting a landlord or seller without the help of professional representation will most likely result in the forfeiture of tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars that could have stayed in your checking account. Case and point: if you were about to sell your home and a fair price was $400,000… but your agent told you a buyer would pay $500,000… what would you list or sell it for? The “fair” price of $400,000… or the most you could get for it? Exactly. You would sell it for the most you could. Your landlord will treat you the same way. They will charge you the highest they can while giving you the least they can get away with.

#2: Determining market value by asking what your neighbors are paying

Several years ago, we were reviewing the lease terms of a doctor who had been in a building for 20 years. In looking at his lease, he was paying $30 per SF, and had not received any free rent or tenant improvement allowance in his last negotiation. When we posed the question: “Do you believe $30 per SF with no concessions is a good deal?”, his response was: “I believe so.” “Why, we asked?” His response: “There are four other healthcare practices on this floor. We all know each other and talk about our leases. We are all paying $30 per SF and the landlord has told all of us they don’t give free rent or tenant improvement allowances.” Our response: “I understand the logic behind that approach… but what if I told you we just did a lease with a brand-new tenant on the first floor at $21 per SF ($1,800 per month in savings if it were your lease rate), while also obtaining 3 months of free rent and over $100,000 in tenant improvement allowance!” The bottom line is that landlord got away with convincing five different practices the market was far higher than it really was and that they didn’t deserve any concessions. Imagine finding out that you have been overpaying by $1,800 per month for the last 5 to 10 years and forfeiting money that could have completely renovated your space? This scenario happens every day to uneducated tenants who consult with other uneducated tenants and compare terms that were the result of having no posture, no knowledge of the market and not applying leverage through representation.

#3: Not knowing market availability and comps

The foundation of a successful negotiation starts with understanding what your other viable options are, how they compare to each other and how to execute on them. When dealing with landlords or sellers, many healthcare providers try to bluff their way into and through negotiations. A savvy landlord or seller can often read a bluff from a mile away. Here is the problem with this approach: it communicates you are too busy, you don’t know who to hire and you don’t know what you could achieve.? Trying to wing it in these scenarios will not work! This approach typically results in less respect from a landlord and the exact opposite results you were hoping for. Also, overly aggressive offers or unrealistic requests can compound the problem, as can emotional responses to the conflict inherent in most high-dollar negotiations. If you are going to be successful in your next negotiation, understanding market availability and comps is the first place to start. You can hire representation to do this for you, or you can invest dozens of hours yourself into the process.

These are just a sample of the more common mistakes you should seek to avoid when looking at your real estate decisions. Unfortunately, there are several more you need to avoid.

Summary

Don’t be taken advantage of during your next purchase or lease negotiation. There is too much on the line. Losing tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars affects your income and can also impact the quality of care you provide. Hire professional representation to level the playing field, start the transaction at the proper time, know the market and top available options and negotiate with multiple owners. If you do these things you are very likely to capitalize on your second highest expense.

Carr Healthcare Realty is the nation’s leading provider of commercial real estate services for healthcare tenants and buyers. Every year, thousands of healthcare practices trust Carr to achieve the most favorable terms on their lease and purchase negotiations. Carr’s team of experts assist with start-ups, lease renewals, expansions, relocations, additional offices, purchases, and practice transitions. Healthcare practices choose Carr to save them a substantial amount of time and money; while ensuring their interests are always first. Visit CARRHR.com to find an expert agent representing healthcare practices in your area

The Quick and Dirty Personal Finance Checkup

On February 14th, my firm Schwartz & Schwartz, PC held the first live webinar in our Financial Boot Camp series titled “The Quick and Dirty Personal Finance Checkup” which was recorded and is now available on YouTube.

Alex Oliver from First National Corporation, a Registered Investment Advisor based in Rockland, MA, presented on a variety of topics. Please? skip around to the topics relevant to you:?https://youtu.be/ho-38UFnEBU

  • 00:00: Introduction
  • 03:39: Building the wealth pyramid
  • 6:00: Student loan planning
  • 09:59: Increasing your credit score
  • 12:23: Emergency fund
  • 14:06: Disability Insurance
  • 18:02: Term life insurance
  • 21:09: Estate planning
  • 24:27: Housing and debt benchmarks
  • 25:31: Retirement benchmarks, planning, and investments
  • ?35:21: Long term care
  • 37:23: College savings benchmarks
  • 39:05: Wrap up and contact information

IRS Explains New Rules for Deducting Mortgage & Equity Loan Interest

From IRS NEWS – Issue IR-2018-32

The Internal Revenue Service today advised taxpayers that in many cases they can continue to deduct interest paid on home equity loans.

Responding to many questions received from taxpayers and tax professionals, the IRS said that despite newly-enacted restrictions on home mortgages, taxpayers can often still deduct interest on a home equity loan, home equity line of credit (HELOC) or second mortgage, regardless of how the loan is labeled. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, enacted Dec. 22, suspends from 2018 until 2026 the deduction for interest paid on home equity loans and lines of credit, unless they are used to buy, build or substantially improve the taxpayer’s home that secures the loan.

Under the new law, for example, interest on a home equity loan used to build an addition to an existing home is typically deductible, while interest on the same loan used to pay personal living expenses, such as credit card debts, is not. As under prior law, the loan must be secured by the taxpayer’s main home or second home (known as a qualified residence), not exceed the cost of the home and meet other requirements.

New dollar limit on total qualified residence loan balance

For anyone considering taking out a mortgage, the new law imposes a lower dollar limit on mortgages qualifying for the home mortgage interest deduction. Beginning in 2018, taxpayers may only deduct interest on $750,000 of qualified residence loans. The limit is $375,000 for a married taxpayer filing a separate return. These are down from the prior limits of $1 million, or $500,000 for a married taxpayer filing a separate return. ?The limits apply to the combined amount of loans used to buy, build or substantially improve the taxpayer’s main home and second home.

The following examples illustrate these points.

Example 1:?In January 2018, a taxpayer takes out a $500,000 mortgage to purchase a main home with a fair market value of $800,000. ?In February 2018, the taxpayer takes out a $250,000 home equity loan to put an addition on the main home. Both loans are secured by the main home and the total does not exceed the cost of the home. Because the total amount of both loans does not exceed $750,000, all of the interest paid on the loans is deductible. However, if the taxpayer used the home equity loan proceeds for personal expenses, such as paying off student loans and credit cards, then the interest on the home equity loan would not be deductible.

Example 2:?In January 2018, a taxpayer takes out a $500,000 mortgage to purchase a main home. ?The loan is secured by the main home. In February 2018, the taxpayer takes out a $250,000 loan to purchase a vacation home. The loan is secured by the vacation home. ?Because the total amount of both mortgages does not exceed $750,000, all of the interest paid on both mortgages is deductible. However, if the taxpayer took out a $250,000 home equity loan on the main home to purchase the vacation home, then the interest on the home equity loan would not be deductible.

Example 3:?In January 2018, a taxpayer takes out a $500,000 mortgage to purchase a main home. ?The loan is secured by the main home. In February 2018, the taxpayer takes out a $500,000 loan to purchase a vacation home. The loan is secured by the vacation home. ?Because the total amount of both mortgages exceeds $750,000, not all of the interest paid on the mortgages is deductible. A percentage of the total interest paid is deductible (see Publication 936).

For more information about the new tax law, visit the?Tax Reform?page on IRS.gov.